Legal Opinion
State v. Chrisicos
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided November 7, 2008No. 2008-135PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.
The defendant, Michelle Chrisicos, appeals an order of the Superior Court {Groff, J.) sentencing her to twelve months in the House of Corrections, stand committed. The State cross-appeals, challenging the trial court’s conclusion that the home confinement provisions of RSA 262:23 (2004) (amended 2006) violate the Equal Protection Clause of the New Hampshire Constitution. See N.H. CONST, pt. I, arts. 1, 2. We reverse the ruling that RSA 262:23 is unconstitutional and affirm the sentence.
The trial court’s order recites, or the record reveals, the following facts. On August 15, 2006, the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Missouri v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Salsburg v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- In re Sandra H.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. WamalaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- In Re PeiranoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- State v. CHRISICOSSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- Contoocook Valley School District & a. v. State of New Hampshire & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2021
- Contoocook Valley School District & a. v. State of New Hampshire & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.