Legal Opinion
State v. CHRISICOS
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided November 17, 2009No. 2009-062PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.
The defendant, Michelle Chrisicos, appeals an order of the Superior Court (Groff, J.) ruling that she is ineligible for a sentence of home confinement under the terms of RSA 262:23 (2004) (amended 2006). We reverse and remand for resentencing.
This is the second time the issue of the defendant’s sentence for driving after being certified as a habitual offender has come before us. See State v. Chrisicos, 158 N.H. 82 (2008). The following facts are recited in Chrisicos or appear in the record before us. The defendant was indicted on August 15, 2006, for driving a motor vehicle after having been…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Duquette v. Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- State v. DeanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- Zorn v. DemetriSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- Appeal of GamasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. EtienneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- State v. Jeremy SurrellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
- Brunelle v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLONSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- Brunelle v. Bank of New York MellonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- State v. CHRISICOSSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.