Legal Opinion

Bundschu v. Naffah

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 2002No. Case No. 00-C.A.-102PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Waite, Judge.

{¶ 1} This timely appeal arises from a judgment entry of the Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas granting summary judgment to appellees, Mike, Eli, and Odette Haffah, in a personal injury action. David Bundschu (“appellant”) and his wife Shirley (collectively referred to as “appellants”) alleged negligence in the placement of a fence pole at a golf driving range. Appellant was injured when a ball he hit ricocheted off the pole and hit his eye. Because the doctrine of primary assumption of the risk, Anderson v. Ceccardi (1983), 6 Ohio St.3d 110, 114, 6 OBR 170, 451 N.E.2d 780,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Sidle v. HumphreyOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Welco Industries, Inc. v. Applied CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Crace v. Kent State UniversityOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Yoneda v. TomHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. PayneOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Oliveri v. OsteoStrongOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. Solanki v. Doug Freshwater Contracting, Inc., 06-Je-39 (12-17-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API