Legal Opinion
Lindsey v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 15, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2007-1939PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.
Harold C. Lindsey, the plaintiff in this civil lawsuit, brings this action against the District of Columbia alleging (1) age discrimination based on the circumstances surrounding his “remov[al] from his position as [an] Accelerant Detection Canine Handler” and the “appointment] of Sergeant Proctor to the position ... [, who u]pon information and belief ... is under the age of 40,” Complaint (“Compl.”) ¶¶ 3 8, 46-47, (2) breach of “a duty of care to abide by the rules, regulations, procedures and laws then in effect within the District of…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- JAIYEOLA v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Craig v. Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Conn v. American National Red CrossDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Arnold v. CarterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Spaeth v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.