Legal Opinion

In the Interest of S.R.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 21, 2007PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

KLEIN, J.:

¶ 1 S.R., then sixteen years old, appeals from the disposition following an adjudication of delinquency on the charges of aggravated indecent assault and related offenses for allegedly molesting his four-year-old niece, L.K. We conclude L.K’s statements to her mother were non-testimonial and therefore properly admitted under the Tender Years Statute. However, because we conclude that L.K.’s statements from her interview with a forensic interview specialist were testimonial, as recently defined by the United States Supreme Court, admission of those statements violated…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Hammon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. BobadillaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. ArroyoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. Coronado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  3. State v. SilerOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. BentleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. AbrueSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API