Legal Opinion

State v. Siler

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 2007No. 2006-0185PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.

{¶ 1} The state of Ohio appeals from a decision of the Ashland County Court of Appeals that reversed Brian Siler’s convictions for aggravated murder and five other offenses and held that the admission of hearsay statements of his three-year-old son at his trial denied him his Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses against him because his child did not testify at trial and because he had no prior opportunity to cross-examine him.

{¶ 2} The focus of this appeal concerns whether a child’s statements made in the course of a police interrogation to a sheriffs deputy should be considered…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. People v. GeierCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. People v. StechlyIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. StahlOhio Supreme Court · 2006

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. State v. ArnoldOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Commonwealth v. AllshouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. State v. JacintoOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. State v. LittleOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. State v. CragerOhio Supreme Court · 2007

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API