Legal Opinion

United States v. Boyd

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided July 10, 2001No. 00-0446/AFPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge GIERKE

delivered the opinion of the Court.

A general court-martial composed of officer members convicted appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of destroying government property, wrongful use of controlled substances (2 specifications), larceny of military property (3 specifications), and conduct unbecoming an officer by wrongfully injecting himself with a controlled substance while on duty and in uniform, in violation of Articles 108, 112a, 121, and 133, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 908, 912a, 921, and 933, respectively. The adjudged and approved sentence provides for a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  3. United States v. GriffinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  4. United States v. GreavesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  5. United States v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. United States v. GilleyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
  2. United States v. GriggsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  3. United States v. McNuttCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  4. United States v. SandersCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
  5. United States v. BridgesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API