Legal Opinion

United States v. McNutt

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 27, 2005No. 04-0295/ARPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Judge GIERKE

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Following the trial of Private Eric M. McNutt, the military judge met with defense and Government counsel to critique their performance, in what is often called a “Bridging the Gap” session.1 During that session, the military judge voluntarily disclosed how he determined the length of Appellant’s sentence. The military judge explained that he sentenced Appellant to seventy days of confinement rather than sixty days because he was aware of the correctional facilities’ policy of granting five days of confinement credit per month for sentences…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  2. United States v. HardisonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  3. United States v. TalkingtonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
  4. United States v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
  5. United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API