Legal Opinion

United States v. David Hayashi

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 27, 1993No. 92-10044PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

David Hayashi appeals his conviction of taking a marine mammal in violation of 16 U.S.C. § 1372(a)(2)(A). We hold that the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) and the regulations implementing the act do not make it a crime to take reasonable steps to deter porpoises from eating fish or bait off a fisherman’s line. Therefore, we conclude that insufficient evidence supported Haya-shi’s conviction, and we reverse.

I

On the morning of January 24,1991, Haya-shi, a part-time commercial fisherman, and his son were fishing for Ahi off the coast of Waianae, Hawaii. A group of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Third Nat. Bank in Nashville v. Impac Limited, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. United States v. Malcolm Lee WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. United States v. Darryl VowiellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Michael Dwayne CombsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. Antonio Lara Solis, United States of America v. Manuel Salazar SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter, Communities for Great Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Sweet Home Chapter of Communities for a Great Oregon v. Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  3. Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter, Communities for Great Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. (HC) Lee v. SpearmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  5. (HC) Ortega-Lara v. HattonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API