Legal Opinion

United States v. Antonio Lara Solis, United States of America v. Manuel Salazar Sanchez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 8, 1988No. 87-1096, 87-1098PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOONAN, Circuit Judge:

Manuel Salazar Sanchez and Antonio Lara Solis appeal their convictions for conspiracy to violate the drug laws of the United States and for distributing heroin. We affirm the conviction of conspiracy and reverse the conviction for distributing.

The most substantial point raised on this appeal is the difference between the indictment and the instructions to the jury on Count 4. Count 4 charged Sanchez and Solis with distributing six ounces of heroin. The instructions to the jury included an instruction on distribution and also instructions on possession of heroin — a crime…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel Chavez LARIOS, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. Raymond CarterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. MontiellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. Frank Kahled Burgos, United States of America v. Alexio Burnard GobernCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. Patrick InnieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Brian Brown (01-2028) and Kevin Courtney (01-2162)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. James Cantu SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Salvatore James PiselloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API