Legal Opinion

(HC) Lee v. Spearman

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 5, 2019No. 2:17-cv-02613Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FREDERICK LEE, No. 2:17-CV-2613-JAM-DMC-P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 N.E. SPEARMAN, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of 18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the court are petitioner’s petition for 19 a writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1), respondent’s answer (ECF No. 12), and petitioner’s traverse 20 (ECF No. 15). 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 //// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 I.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Appel v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  3. Pirtle v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Gloria Killian v. Susan Poole, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API