Legal Opinion

People v. Hill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 2000No. Appeal No. 1Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record establishes that defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his right to appeal (see, People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 736; People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 280). That waiver encompasses the contention of defendant that Supreme Court erred in denying his suppression motion (see, People v Duncan, 267 AD2d 995, lv denied 94 NY2d 918; People v Frank, 258 AD2d 900, lv denied 93 NY2d 924; People v Outling, 231 AD2d 911, lv denied 89 NY2d 945). The waiver also encompasses defendant’s contention that the sentence is harsh and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. SeabergNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. People v. HidalgoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. People v. CallahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Felix v. HermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. People v. OutlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API