Legal Opinion

City of Whitwell v. Fowler

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1961PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tomlinsoh

The Court denies the application of appellants to withhold disposition of this case until there arrives here a case said to be of a similar nature and said to be now pending in some other Court.

This suit originated as a proceedings instituted by Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company before the Tennessee Public Service Commission for the purpose, in so far as pertinent here, of causing 54 telephone exchanges to be placed in different rate groups.

At the time these proceedings were instituted, the various rate groups in existence were those created by the Commission in 1954. They were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hoover Motor Exp. Co. v. Railroad & Public Utilities CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Board of Equalization v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Tennessee Public Service CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Putnam County Beer Board v. SpeckTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Roberts v. Knoxville Transit LinesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. CF Industries v. Tennessee Public Service CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Fidelity Bankers Trust Co. v. Chapman Drug Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1962
  3. Briley v. Cumberland Water Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Westland Drive Service Co. v. Citizens & Southern Realty InvestorsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1977
  5. Allen v. FowlerTennessee Supreme Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API