Legal Opinion
Waldeck v. Curtis 1000, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 11, 2003No. A03A0014PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Johnson, Presiding Judge.
This appeal involves the enforceability of a restrictive covenant contained in an employment agreement. Kevin Waldeck and his current employer, Data Systems, Inc. (“DSI”), appeal from the grant of interlocutory relief to Waldeck’s former employer, Curtis 1000, Inc.
Waldeck worked as a sales representative for Curtis 1000, a business stationery and office supplies distributor. Waldeck was assigned a sales territory in the Columbus, Georgia area. During his employment at Curtis 1000, Waldeck signed an agreement which contained several restrictions on his post-employment…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. MouyalSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
- Singer v. Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, P.C.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Orkin Exterminating Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Akron Pest Control v. Radar Exterminating Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, P.C. v. BaggettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Palmer & Cay, Inc. v. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- H&R BLOCK EASTERN ENTERPRISES, INC. v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Carson v. Obor Holding Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Holland Insurance Group, LLC v. Senior Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Murphree v. Yancey Bros. Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.