Legal Opinion
Murphree v. Yancey Bros. Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 21, 2011No. A11A1079PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dillard, Judge.
Edward William Murphree and his employer, Flint Equipment Company (“Flint”), appeal the trial court’s grant of an interlocutory injunction to Yancey Brothers Company (“Yancey”) to enforce a restrictive covenant contained in the employment contract Mur-phree had with his former employer. Murphree and Flint contend that the trial court erred in finding the restrictive covenant valid and enforceable. For the reasons set forth infra, we affirm the trial court’s findings related to the restrictive covenant, as well as its grant of the interlocutory injunction against Murphree and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Howard Schultz & Associates of Southeast, Inc. v. BroniecSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. MouyalSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
- Pittman v. Harbin Clinic Professional AssociationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- Advance Technology Consultants, Inc. v. RoadTrac, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, P.C. v. BaggettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Holland Insurance Group, LLC v. Senior Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Berger v. WelshCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Ryanne Early v. Mimedx Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- VULCAN STEEL STRUCTURES, INC. Et Al. v. McCARTY Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- General Assurance of America, Inc. v. Overby-Seawell Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.