Legal Opinion

Tanner v. Imperial Recreation Parlors, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 6, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDowling, J.

At the times hereinafter mentioned the defendant operated a restaurant, saloon and a recreation business in a large building located on Genesee street, Auburn, N. Y. In or about 1934 or 1935, the defendant hired the plaintiff as the janitor, fireman and night watchman in said building “ to work seven days a week ’ ’ at the agreed sum of twenty-one dollars per week, payable on Friday of each week. The plaintiff agreed to work from eleven-forty-five p. m. to seven a. m. on weekdays and to eight a. m. on Sundays. The plaintiff entered upon the per*372formance of said agreement and continued therein…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jessup v. . CarnegieNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. McCarthy v. . Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Newburgh Savings Bank v. Town of WoodburyNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. Thibault v. National Tea Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  5. Bachelder v. BickfordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1872

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McElroy v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Livingston v. Todd Shipyards Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API