Legal Opinion
McElroy v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 3, 1966PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtM. Henry Martuscello, J.
Plaintiffs move for summary judgment upon the ground that there are no triable issues of fact, and the defendant cross-moves for the same relief.
Plaintiffs seek to recover compensation for overtime work allegedly performed by them as auto mechanics and machinists in the employ of the Department of Sanitation of the City of New York. They claim that the city compelled them to work 45 minutes overtime each workday during the past six years 'without compensating them therefor and accordingly owes to each of them “ unpaid wages of $4500.” The defendant denies the claim thus made and moreover…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Glenn L. Martin Nebraska Co. v. CulkinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- F. W. Stock & Sons, Inc. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
- McAvoy v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Culkin v. Glenn L. Martin Nebraska Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hill v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- City of Troy Unit v. City of TroyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- Brooks v. WhaleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980