Legal Opinion

McCathern v. Toyota Motor Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 28, 1999No. 9601-00689; CA A98578PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Plaintiff Linda McCathem brought this product liability action against Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., and Broadway Toyota (collectively Toyota) for damages arising from severe permanent injuries she sustained when the 1994 Toyota 4Runner in which she was a passenger rolled over at high speed. At trial, the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff, and Toyota appeals. We conclude that the trial court did not err in denying Toyota’s motions for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV), because plaintiff submitted evidence from which a jury could…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Honda Motor Co. v. ObergSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Brown v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Phillips v. Kimwood MacHine CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Leichtamer v. American Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Seattle-First National Bank v. TabertWashington Supreme Court · 1975

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McCathern v. Toyota Motor Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Hayes Oyster Co. v. DulcichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Benson Tower Condominium Owners Ass'n v. Victaulic Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
  4. State v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  5. Knepper v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API