Legal Opinion

Shipp v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 1974No. Appeal, No. 1476 C. D. 1973PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

Frank Shipp, Jr. (decedent) was employed as a pump man for Sanctis Construction Company (employer). His usual duties were to prime, start, and maintain a gasoline driven pump at the excavation site for the foundation of the United States Steel Building in Pittsburgh. The pump area was located 80 to 90 feet below the street level and the hose- extended from the pump area to the manholes on the street where it would discharge water through a four inch opening. The exclusive means of access between the manholes and the pump area was by a dirt ramp approximately 300 feet…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Procon, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. Riley Stoker Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. United Metal Fabricators, Inc. v. ZindashCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Besco v. General Woodcraft & FoundryCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Empire Kosher Poultry, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Norato v. Tasty Cake Baking Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Inter-State Tile & Mantel Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Merryman v. United States Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API