Legal Opinion

Besco v. General Woodcraft & Foundry

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 18, 1972No. Appeal, No. 701 C.D. 1972PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

Joseph Besco (claimant) was employed by General Woodcraft & Foundry (employer) as a carpenter when, on July 18, 1968, he was allegedly exposed to noxious fumes or sewer gas, as a result of which he suffered an acute labrynthitis. The claimant thereafter filed a claim petition pursuant to the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. §1 et seq., had a hearing before a referee, and was awarded compensation. On appeal, the Workmen’s Compensation Board (Board) reversed the referee and found that the claimant had not been exposed to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Overmiller v. D. E. Horn & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Lieberman v. Sunray Drug Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Newancavitch v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Giana v. Byllesby Engineering & Management Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Hosterman v. BestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Riley Stoker Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. United Metal Fabricators, Inc. v. ZindashCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. General Woodcraft & Foundry v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Marincov v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. HolleyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API