Legal Opinion
Messner v. Board of Dental Examiners
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 30, 1927No. Docket No. 3343PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
This is an original application for a writ of review by which petitioner seeks to have annulled an order of respondent Board, hereinafter referred to as respondent, suspending his license to practice dentistry for a period of ten years.
The accusation upon which he was tried alleges that on or about March 25, 1927, he “did wilfully and unlawfully aid and abet an unlicensed person, to-wit: W. M. Cohn, to practice dentistry, ... in that the said Karl W. Messner did then and there practice dentistry in an office managed and conducted by the said W. M. Cohn,- that the said Karl W. Messner at this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coulter v. PoolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Garvin v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- E. Clemens Horst Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Gordon v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Osborne v. BaughmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Quintal v. Laurel Grove HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Long Beach City High School District v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Webster v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Painless Parker v. Board of Dental Exam.California Supreme Court · 1932
- Cornell v. ReillyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.