Legal Opinion
Osborne v. Baughman
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 24, 1927No. Docket No. 5462PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
This is an appeal from a, judgment of the superior court annulling, upon writ of review, an order of the State Board of Dental Examiners whereby the license of respondent to practice dentistry in the state of California was revoked. The questions to be determined are whether there was any testimony adduced before the board showing that respondent was chargeable with knowledge that his unlicensed employee was practicing dentistry, and whether such knowledge is necessary before it can be said that a dentist is aiding or abetting an unlicensed person to practice dentistry.
Inasmuch as appellant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mar Shee v. Maryland Assurance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Great Western Power Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Maupin v. SolomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Dowd v. Atlas Taxicab & Auto Service Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Everett v. Standard Accident InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Evening Sentinel v. National Organization for WomenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Geist v. MooreIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
- Winning v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Fuller v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Bold v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.