Kramer v. Cedu Foundation, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAMURA, Acting P. J.
These appeals involve two distinct problems: (1) A negligent employer’s right to reimbursement of workers’ compensation benefits in an employee’s third party action and (2) an owner’s right to be indemnified by a contractor employed to supervise a building project for liability resulting from an injuiy sustained by an employee of a subcontractor.
The background of these appeals is as follows:
Defendant Cedu Foundation, Inc. (Cedu), a nonprofit residential school for disturbed young people, contracted with Louis Rehm (Rehm) to supervise the construction of a training…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
- American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Bay Development, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Munoz v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Bear Creek Planning Committee v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Turcon Construction, Inc. v. Norton-Villiers, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Kohn v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.