Legal Opinion
Liff v. Office of the Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Labor
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 8, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2014-1162PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Stewart Liff, an experienced consultant in public-sector human-resources management, says he and his eponymous firm, Stewart Liff & Associates, have been wrongfully impugned by several arms of the federal government. Both thus sued the U.S. Department of Labor, its Office of Inspector General, the Office of Personnel Management, and several DOL and OPM officers. They allege that Defendants violated both the Fifth Amendment and the Administrative Procedure Act by falsely suggesting, in public statements and documents,…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Liff v. Office of Inspector General for U.S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Jefferson v. HarrisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Joel Guillen v. City of Chula Vista, et al.District Court, S.D. California · 2025
- Liff v. Office of Inspector General for the U.S. Department of LaborDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Liff v. Office of Inspector General for the U.S. Department of LaborDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.