Legal Opinion

McBroom & Wilson Co. v. Gandy

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1897No. 2749PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County.—Hon. "W. E. Richardson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gordon, J.

Appellant, plaintiff in the lower court, appeals from an order setting aside a verdict of the jury in its favor and awarding a new trial. In this court he assigns two grounds of error: (1) That neither the notice of motion nor the motion itself was served after the filing thereof. (2) “That the court erred in granting a new trial for the reason that the verdict was supported by the evidence and no prejudicial error was committed at the trial.”

As to the first assignment, the record shows that the notice of motion for a new trial was filed with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rotting v. ClemanWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Turner v. BaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Corbitt v. HarringtonWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. State v. SymesWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Rinehart v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sylvester v. OlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Welever v. Advance Shingle Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Hughes v. Dexter Horton & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Angus v. WambaWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Latimer v. BlackWashington Supreme Court · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API