Legal Opinion

Turner v. Bailey

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1895No. 1588PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gordon, J.

J.— The respondents have moved this court to strike the statement of facts and to affirm the judgment, for the reason that said statement was not served upon respondents before the filing thereof and because no copy of the same was served • on the respondents after the original was filed. This motion is supported by the affidavit of one of the respondents.

An examination of the record discloses that, upon the day of filing the statement of facts in the superior court, the appellants served upon the respondents a. notice which, after entitling…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gamble v. Queens County Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Hospes v. Northwestern Manuf'g & Car Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Coit v. Gold Amalgamating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Douglass v. . IrelandNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Young v. Erie Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Adamant Manufacturing Co. of America v. WallaceWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Lantz v. MoellerWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Inland Nursery & Floral Co. v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Manhattan Trust Co. v. Seattle Coal & Iron Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Johns v. ClothesWashington Supreme Court · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API