Legal Opinion

Rinehart v. Watson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1895No. 1322PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J.

Upon the trial of this action the court granted a motion for a non-suit, and thereafter, upon the plaintiff's motion, the judgment of non-suit was-set aside and a new trial granted. This appeal is prosecuted from said order, appellants claiming that the court erred in vacating said judgment. The respondent contends that not only was the judgment of non-suit properly set aside, but that the court should have gone further and rendered judgment in his favor, and asks that the cause be remanded, with an instruction to that effect.

The granting of a…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sylvester v. OlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. State v. SymesWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  3. McBroom & Wilson Co. v. GandyWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  4. O'Rourke v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Colvin v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API