Legal Opinion

Aravanis v. Somerset County

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 13, 1995No. 22PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Judge.

We granted certiorari to consider whether Maryland’s drug forfeiture statute, Maryland Code (1957, 1992 Repl.Vol.), Article 27, § 297, is subject to an excessive fines analysis pursuant to the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution,1 and/or its Maryland counterpart, Article 25 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights.2 We are also invited, should we find the analysis appropriate, to formulate a test for determining when a particular forfeiture is unconstitutionally excessive. We shall hold that civil in rem forfeitures are subject to an excessive fines analysis.…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. DiPino v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Garrity v. Maryland State Board of PlumbingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  3. State v. ZiepfelOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Boyd v. HickmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. Jones v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API