Legal Opinion

State v. Dahl

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 20, 2002No. PR106249; A112549PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment finding that she violated the maximum speed limit in an urban area. ORS 811.123. A police photo radar unit measured the vehicle’s speed and photographed the driver. To prove that defendant was the driver of the vehicle, the state relied solely on ORS 810.439(l)(b), which establishes a rebuttable presumption that the registered owner of a vehicle was its driver when a photo radar citation has been issued and delivered. Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of her motion for judgment of acquittal, arguing that, by relying solely on that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Brown v. Multnomah County District CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Bandini Petroleum Co. v. Superior Court, Los Angeles Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. DahlOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. NollenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. Empire Wholesale Lumber Co. v. MeyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. State v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. State v. GreenlickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API