Legal Opinion
Department of Transportation v. Fru-Con Construction Corp.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided December 1, 1992No. A92A1239PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Carley, Presiding Judge.
The facts, insofar as they are relevant to the instant appeal, are as follows: Appellant-defendant Department of Transportation (DOT) undertook a highway construction project which included the construction of some 15 bridges. DOT contracted with appellee-plaintiff Fru-Con Construction for the construction of these bridges. The contract specified that appellee would complete the bridges by a specified date and that, if it did not, it would be liable for liquidated damages. Appellee failed to complete the bridges within the time specified in its contract and, for this…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Georgia Power Co. v. BusbinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Brown v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Department of Transportation v. Arapaho Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Department of Transportation v. Arapaho Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- England v. Georgia-Florida Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Georgia Department of Corrections v. CouchSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
- Fought & Co. v. Steel Engineering & Erection, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1998
- Georgia Department of Community Health v. Data Inquiry, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Waters v. Glynn CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Webster v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.