Legal Opinion
Department of Transportation v. Arapaho Construction, Inc.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided July 9, 1987No. 43956PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Justice.
We granted certiorari in this case to determine if the Court of Appeals correctly construed the “termination provision” of the parties’ contract. Dept. of Transp. v. Arapaho Constr., Inc., 180 Ga. App. 341 (1) (349 SE2d 196) (1986).
Appellee Arapaho Construction, Inc. (hereinafter Arapaho), was the bridge contractor, for the appellant, Department of Transportation (hereinafter DOT), on the highway project known as the Presidential Parkway. The parties’ contract provided, inter alia, that the DOT would provide the necessary rights-of-way in advance of actual construction…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kalisch-Jarcho, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Corinno Civetta Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Grant Construction Co. v. BurnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
- Ace Stone, Inc. v. Township of WayneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
- Department of Transportation v. BrooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Imaging Systems International, Inc. v. Magnetic Resonance Plus, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Department of Transportation v. Fru-Con Construction Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- State Highway Administration v. Greiner Engineering Sciences, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Woodhull Corp. v. Saibaba Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Department of Transportation v. APAC-Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.