Legal Opinion
Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Harmon
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 29, 1974No. Civ. 42617PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*807Opinion
HASTINGS, J.
Declaratory relief to interpret an automobile insurance policy. Defendants and appellants Harmon and Zamacona appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff Farmers Insurance Exchange (Farmers).
Facts
The facts are undisputed. Defendants Alvin and Doris Harmon (Harmons) are insured by plaintiff Farmers. Doris Harmon (Harmon, or where appropriate, insured) was driving a non-owned vehicle in or near Tepic, Mexico, which is approximately 800 miles south of the American border. An accident occurred and Armando Zamacona was seriously injured. Eleason Zamacona, owner of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Bareno v. Employers Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Ogburn v. Travelers InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Burke Concrete Accessories, Inc. v. TolsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. CossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Giddings v. Industrial Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1980
- Chamberlin v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Fire Insurance Exchange v. JiminezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.