Legal Opinion

Village of Brookfield v. Pentis

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 4, 1939No. 6604PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of Illinois, appeals from an order dismissing, upon joint motion of all defendants, its third amended bill of complaint.

Plaintiff’s averments were in substance as follows: Pentis was the village treasurer from May, 1927 to April, 1929, and again from May, 1930 to April, 1934. For the year 1927 the treasurer, as principal, and defendant American Bonding Company, as surety, executed a bond in the sum of $50,000 whereby they were obligated to pay plaintiff that sum if the conditions should be broken.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Marcus Brown Holding Co. v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Rothschild v. Village of Calumet ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  4. White v. ShermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  5. The People v. SmallIllinois Supreme Court · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Klamath & Modoc Tribes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  2. County of Cook v. BarrettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  3. American National Bank & Trust Co. v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  4. Citizens Banking Co. v. Monticello State BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  5. People Ex Rel. Daley v. Warren Motors, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API