Legal Opinion

Klamath & Modoc Tribes v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 18, 1966No. 125-61; No. 87-62PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoweN, Chief Judge

The petition in Docket No. 125-61 was filed to recover additional compensation for property of the Klamath Tribe disposed of or taken by the United States during the termination of Federal supervision over the affairs of the tribe and its members pursuant to the Klamath Termination Act of August 13, 1954, 68 Stat. 718. Thereafter, on March 22, 1962, the petition in Docket No. 87-62 was filed by a number of withdrawing members of the tribe suing in their own behalf for additional compensation for property disposed of or taken by the United States during the Klamath termination. Motions were…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. Milliken Imprinting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Creek Nation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  4. Clay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  5. Village of Brookfield v. PentisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, Gale A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
  3. John Doe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  4. Laura Hebah, Administratrix, in the Matter of the Estate of Robert Hebah, Deceased v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  5. Pauley Petroleum Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API