Legal Opinion

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. A. & P. Cleaners & Dyers, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 14, 1934No. 2794PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.

This is an equity suit in which the plaintiff is seeking to enjoin the defendant from using a trade-mark or designation of its business, comprised of the letters “A. & P.” in distinctive form, color, and design. The case was heard on bill, answer, and proofs. From these we find the following facts.

Findings of Fact.(1) The plaintiff is a corporation of the state of New Jersey and is a citizen of that state.(2) The defendant is a Pennsylvania corporation and a citizen of that state.(3) The amount in controversy, exclusive of interest and costs, is in excess of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Yale Electric Corporation v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  2. Local No. 7 Bricklayers', Masons' & Plasterers' International Union v. BowenDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1922
  3. Lambert v. YellowleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  4. Certain-Teed Products Corp. v. Philadelphia & Suburban Mortgage Guarantee Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1931
  5. Prest-O-Lite Co. v. BournonvilleDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1914

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. A. & P. Radio Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Philco Corporation v. Phillips Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  3. Miles Laboratories, Inc. v. SeigniousDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1939
  4. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. a & P Trucking Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  5. Henry Furnace Co. v. KappelmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API