Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. A. & P. Cleaners & Dyers, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.
This is an equity suit in which the plaintiff is seeking to enjoin the defendant from using a trade-mark or designation of its business, comprised of the letters “A. & P.” in distinctive form, color, and design. The case was heard on bill, answer, and proofs. From these we find the following facts.
Findings of Fact.(1) The plaintiff is a corporation of the state of New Jersey and is a citizen of that state.(2) The defendant is a Pennsylvania corporation and a citizen of that state.(3) The amount in controversy, exclusive of interest and costs, is in excess of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Yale Electric Corporation v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Local No. 7 Bricklayers', Masons' & Plasterers' International Union v. BowenDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1922
- Lambert v. YellowleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Certain-Teed Products Corp. v. Philadelphia & Suburban Mortgage Guarantee Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1931
- Prest-O-Lite Co. v. BournonvilleDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1914
3Cited by10 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. A. & P. Radio Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1937
- Philco Corporation v. Phillips Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- Miles Laboratories, Inc. v. SeigniousDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1939
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. a & P Trucking Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Henry Furnace Co. v. KappelmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.