Legal Opinion
Lambert v. Yellowley
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 19, 1924No. 7PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
The complainant is a physieian engaged in the practice of medicine in the city of Hew York. It is conceded that he is a man of great distinction in his profession and of wide and unusual experience in the practice of medicine. He filed a bill of complaint in the court below, in which he asked that provisions in the Hational Prohibition Act, commonly known as the Volstead Act, being the Act of October 28, 1919 (41 Stat. 305, c. 85 [Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 10138¼ et seq.]), as well as of the act supplemental to the Hational Prohibition Act, being the Act of Hovember…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Adkins v. Children's Hospital of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Thurlow v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Del Monte Special Food Co. v. California Packing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- In re the Estate of RougeronNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Miles Laboratories, Inc. v. SeigniousDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1939
- Pure Oil Co. v. Puritan Oil Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1941
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. A. & P. Cleaners & Dyers, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1934
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.