Legal Opinion
Los Angeles Unified School District v. Pulgarin
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 23, 2009No. B206892PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, P. J.
Elisa and Juan Pulgarin, doing business as Mid Town Recycling (collectively Mid Town) appeal from an order dismissing their claim for loss of goodwill allegedly caused by the acquisition by eminent domain of the real property upon which Mid Town’s business was conducted. We conclude that the lack of a written lease is not fatal to Mid Town’s entitlement to compensation for goodwill, and reverse the order.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
The Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) filed an action in eminent domain to acquire commercial property owned by A&D Investment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. MullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board v. Handlery Hotel, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Redevelopment Agency v. Thrifty Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Redevelopment Agency v. Arvey Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Redevelopment Agency v. AttishaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Los Angeles Unified School District v. CasasolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Weiss v. People ex rel. Dep't of Transp., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Weiss v. P. ex rel. Dept. of TransportationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- Weiss v. P. ex rel. etc.California Court of Appeal · 2018