Legal Opinion

Redevelopment Agency v. Arvey Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 1992No. A050458PublishedCited by 14 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

POCHÉ, J.

Defendants, Arvey Corporation, Transo Envelope Company and International Paper Company, 1 appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict awarding them $225,000 for business goodwill lost because their property was condemned by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Emeryville (Agency). In 1989 the Agency filed an eminent domain action to condemn, for public purposes, property on which appellant Arvey operated the Transo Envelope Company. In 1990 a jury trial was conducted to determine just compensation for the property taken and the amount of Arvey’s lost business goodwill.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. WileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. MullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Beasley v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. City of Lafayette v. East Bay Municipal Utility DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. Emeryville Redevelopment Agency v. Elementis Pigments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Flowmaster, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. City of San Diego v. SobkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Inglewood Redevelopment Agency v. AkliluCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API