Legal Opinion
Redevelopment Agency v. Attisha
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 6, 2005No. D043044PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McCONNELL, P. J.
In this eminent domain case, defendants Bahira and Behnam Attisha and Kheder and Balsam Attisha appeal a judgment awarding them $400,000 for loss of business goodwill. The Attishas contend the trial court erred by (1) disallowing compensation for business inventory; (2) striking the testimony of their expert goodwill valuation witness on the grounds that (a) under this court’s opinion in San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Bd. v. Handlery Hotel, Inc. (1999) 73 Cal.App.4th 517 [86 Cal.Rptr.2d 473] (Handlery), as a matter of law the expectation of a lease renewal…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. DeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Long Beach City High School District v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. LoopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Gomes v. County of MendocinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Inglewood Redevelopment Agency v. AkliluCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Redevelopment Agency of San Diego v. MesdaqCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- City of Santa Clarita v. NTS Technical SystemsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- People ex rel. Department of Transportation v. Dry Canyon Enterprises, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Los Angeles Unified School District v. PulgarinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.