Legal Opinion

Gates Co. v. Housing Appeals Board

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1967No. 40474PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchneider, J.

More often than not, before the court can intelligently approach a controversy for what it actually is, it is necessary to determine what it is not. This is such a case.

First, there is nothing in the Columbus Housing Code from which an inference may be drawn that the failure of any building to conform to its requirements constitutes an imminent threat to the health, safety, morals or welfare of the public generally. It is relevant in this connection to note that the Code permits, among other things, one complete set of bathroom facilities to serve as many as ten unrelated persons residing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCarty v. . Natural Carbonic Gas Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Solly v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Schiff v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Glass v. DrydenOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Wolfe v. City of AvonOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Northern Ohio Sign Contractors Ass'n v. City of LakewoodOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. City of Dublin v. FinkesOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Monus v. DayOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API