Legal Opinion

State v. Buckley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1968No. 68-5PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeowN, J.

The relevant provisions of Sections 4737.05 to 4737.99, Revised Code, provide as follows:

Section 4737.05. “As used in Sections 4737.05 to 4737.11, inclusive, of the Revised Code:

<<* * *

“(B) ‘Junk yard’ means an establishment * * * other than an establishment having facilities for processing iron, steel, or non-ferrous scrap and whose principal product is scrap iron and steel or non-ferrous scrap for *130sale for remelting purposes, which is maintained or operated for the purpose of storing, keeping, buying, or selling junk, or for the maintenance or operation of an automobile graveyard * * *.
“…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. WaltersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Central Lumber Co. v. South DakotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. City of Norwood v. HorneyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Sorrell v. ThevenirOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. McCrone v. Bank One Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Morris v. SavoyOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Beatty v. Akron City HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1981

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API