Legal Opinion
State v. Buckley
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 31, 1968No. 68-5PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeowN, J.
The relevant provisions of Sections 4737.05 to 4737.99, Revised Code, provide as follows:
Section 4737.05. “As used in Sections 4737.05 to 4737.11, inclusive, of the Revised Code:
<<* * *
“(B) ‘Junk yard’ means an establishment * * * other than an establishment having facilities for processing iron, steel, or non-ferrous scrap and whose principal product is scrap iron and steel or non-ferrous scrap for *130sale for remelting purposes, which is maintained or operated for the purpose of storing, keeping, buying, or selling junk, or for the maintenance or operation of an automobile graveyard * * *.
“…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. WaltersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Central Lumber Co. v. South DakotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- City of Norwood v. HorneyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Sorrell v. ThevenirOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- McCrone v. Bank One Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2005
- Morris v. SavoyOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Beatty v. Akron City HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1981
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.