Legal Opinion
Moherman v. Nickels
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 2, 1942No. 29159PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
Two questions are here presented. The first is whether the trial court had the power to reinstate the defendant Donley as a party defendant under the circumstances of this case. The second is whether the court, even though it had the power to reinstate, committed error in so doing.
Section 11631, General Code, provides for the modification or vacation of a judgment or order after the term at which it was entered and specifically names the grounds for such action on the part of the trial •court. The action of the trial court in the instant case was taken at the same term and hence the Code…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Douglas v. Daniels Bros. Coal Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
- Buehrer v. Provident Mutual Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1931
- Genga v. Director General of RailroadsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- McLaughlin v. West End Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Richard v. American Union BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Jacobson v. Southern Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1957
- Likover v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
- McCue v. Buckeye Union InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1979
- Terwoord v. HarrisonOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Tims v. Holland Furnace Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.