Harrison v. Southern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, C. J.,
after stating the case: Conceding the sufficiency of the evidence to permit the inference that plaintiff’s intestate was killed by defendant’s passing freight train (Cox v. R. R., 123 N. C., 604, 31 S. E., 348), still the record is barren of any evidence of actionable negligence on the part of the defendant. Negligence is not presumed from the mere fact of an injury. Austin v. R. R., 197 N. C., 319, 148 S. E., 446; Miller v. Holland, 196 N. C., 739, 147 S. E., 8; Lamb v. Boyles, 192 N. C., 542, 135 S. E., 464; Isley v. Bridge Co., 141 N. C., 220, 53 S. E., 841.
What was the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cox v. Norfolk & Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Lamb v. . BoylesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Davis v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Ward v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1894
- Clegg v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mills v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Mills v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Mercer v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Cummings v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Mercer v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.