Kopelke v. Kopelke
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Jasper Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.
In this case, errors have been assigned hereby appellant, the defendant below, as follows:
*4361. The court below erred in overruling his motion for a new trial.
2. Error of the court in rendering judgment for appellee, over appellant’s objections, for $503.66 and costs, the same being too large.
• The point is made by appellee’s learned counsel, and is pressed with much earnestness, that the bill of exceptions containing the evidence “ is not properly in the record.” If counsel is correct in this position, it is manifest that no question would or could be presented for our decision by the record of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Fort Wayne, Jackson & Saginaw R. R. v. HusselmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Goodwin v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Goddard v. FosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Hunt v. StandartIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
- Coan v. GrimesIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Rose v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. GrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Garrigue v. KellarIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- American Fire Insurance Co. of New York v. SiskIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.