Legal Opinion
Tom We Shung v. Brownell
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 7, 1953No. 241PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Certiorari, 346 U. S. 854, to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
2Per curiam
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the complaint. Heikkila v. Barber, 345 U. S. 229.
Mr. Justice Black would re*907verse the judgment of the Court of Appeals. Mb. Justice Douglas and Mb. Justice Jackson dissent. Jack Wasserman argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Murray L. Schwartz argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Heikkila v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
4Cited by24 opinions
- Robert L. McLaurin v. Josef E. Fischer, and University of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Song Jook Suh v. George K. Rosenberg, District Director, Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Baker v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Daniel J. Donovan v. Esso Shipping CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Firchau v. Diamond National Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.