Legal Opinion

State v. Hearst

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 2001No. COA00-1402PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

The issue on appeal is whether upon activation of his suspended sentence, defendant William Anthony Hearst was entitled to credit for time spent during his probation in the Intensive Motivational Program of Alternative Correctional Treatment (IMPACT).

Defendant initially pled guilty to various charges and was awarded a suspended sentence with probation that was later modified to require his participation in the IMPACT program, which he did for eighty-one days. However, he violated conditions of his probation and the trial judge activated his sentence but denied him any credit for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matter of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. JarmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Dedo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  4. State v. FellhauerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. State v. FarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HearstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API