Legal Opinion

Ramsey v. Faust

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 6, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-1818PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on James Edward Ramsey’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, as amended. 1 For the reasons discussed below, the petition will be denied and this action will be dismissed.

I. BACKGROUND

On June 6, 1984, in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, petitioner was sentenced to a five to 15 year term of imprisonment on his conviction for assault with intent to commit rape, an offense committed on December 23, 1978. United States’ Opp’n to the Pet’r’s Pet. for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Gov’t Opp’n”), at 2;…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Robert Franklin v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
  5. Sellmon v. ReillyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cutchin v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. Richardson v. U.S. Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  3. Baker v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  4. Battle v. CiolliDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
  5. Maza v. WareDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API