Legal Opinion

McCloskey v. Eagleton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 1990No. 57541PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARY M. GAERTNER, Presiding Judge.

Appellant, Mark T. McCloskey, appeals from the dismissal with prejudice of his first amended petition for failure to state a cause of action. The sole issue presented for our review is whether an at-will employee may maintain an action for wrongful discharge based on the open courts provision of the Missouri Constitution. Mo. CONST, art. I, § 14.

Appellant was hired on May 15, 1986, as an associate attorney with the law firm of Thompson and Mitchell, respondents herein. According to a letter which was sent to appellant immediately before he began his…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 396California Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  5. Parnar v. Americana Hotels, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Faust v. Ryder Commercial Leasing & ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Groce v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. Kirk v. Mercy Hospital Tri-CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Jersey v. John Muir Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Luethans v. Washington UniversityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API