Legal Opinion
James Colby Danielson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 25, 1963No. 18121_1PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLIN, Circuit Judge.
James Colby Danielson, appellant herein, Arthur James Yee and Joe Waugh, Jr., were charged in the first count of an indictment with having conspired in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 to commit offenses against the laws of the United States in that—
“they conspired in violation of Section 495, Title 18, United States Code, to knowingly falsely make, forge and counterfeit and knowingly utter and publish as true, with the intent to defraud the United States of America, 171 United States Savings Bonds * * *, for the purpose of obtaining and receiving from the United States and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Ingram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Bernardino Chirez Hernandez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Hugh MacLeod Pheaster, United States of America v. Angelo IncisoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Joseph CalabroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Howard Eugene MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Amos Searan and Jeanettia SearanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Solomon Leroy BrownCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.