Legal Opinion

State v. Baker

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 14, 1924No. 24,134PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Defendant was convicted of manslaughter caused by an illegal abortion, performed by him upon a young woman, and appeals from the order denying a new trial.

Error is assigned upon the refusal of the court to dismiss for lack of proof when the state rested. Defendant did not see fit to rest, but introduced his evidence in defense. In that situation the practice is well settled in civil cases. “The denial of a motion to dismiss or of a motion for judgment will never be reversed in this court if evidence sufficient to sustain the respondent’s case is received at any time during the trial.” Weide…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. JosselynCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  2. State v. WhitmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  3. Busack v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Weide v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. PehrsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. State v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  4. State v. LemkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  5. State v. DotySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API